x264 Video Codec 0.165.3223+44
User Reviews & Comments - 17 reviews
4.06
JU
Justin
9 Dec 2011
5/5Excellent
x264 is the new hotness of encoders. Compared to XviD and DivX, there really is no comparison.
Reviewed on x264 Video Codec 2120
Reply to Justin
DE
Dewd
14 Jul 2011
5/5Excellent
Also, interlaced is supported now, and works amazing. You can archive interlaced material for more fluid and natural, TV look.
Reviewed on x264 Video Codec 2019
Reply to Dewd
RE
Registered11
17 Jun 2011
5/5Excellent
the best just keeps getting better, and x264 wins in all situations when comparing it to Xvid, the experts over at doom9 all agree that there is not a situation where Xvid (ASP) is superior to x264.
there should never be a situation where Xvid gives superior results to x264, if this does occur than without doubt x264 has been mishandled (utilized incorrectly with settings perhaps) in someway.
x264 is superior to ASP encoders in every sense of the word, x264 was designed from the ground up to be a LOW & HIGH bitrate encoder!
there should never be a situation where Xvid gives superior results to x264, if this does occur than without doubt x264 has been mishandled (utilized incorrectly with settings perhaps) in someway.
x264 is superior to ASP encoders in every sense of the word, x264 was designed from the ground up to be a LOW & HIGH bitrate encoder!
Reviewed on x264 Video Codec 2008
Reply to Registered11
RE
renegadeviking
3 Sep 2010
5/5Excellent
x264 now acts like a Bluray encoder. That means the artifacts are minimal at high bitrates. Looks good at 500 Kbps. Doesn't show blocking at like 700 Kbps. No longer drops frames.
The newer exe files are not compatible with older front-ends. CAVLC has "trellis" now. psy-trellis now works with CAVLC.
Better looking than DivX 8.0.
The newer exe files are not compatible with older front-ends. CAVLC has "trellis" now. psy-trellis now works with CAVLC.
Better looking than DivX 8.0.
Reviewed on x264 Video Codec 1703
Reply to renegadeviking
RE
renegadeviking
29 Jan 2008
5/5Excellent
Better than Xvid. VFW version is unreal! The desktop shots look beautiful. Does jaggies from time to time, but 90% of the time I can't see jaggies at 313 kbps.
rev. 735
rev. 735
Reviewed on x264 Video Codec 736
Reply to renegadeviking
VB
Vboy
15 Jul 2007
5/5Excellent
The best codec. Earlier i used to use Xvid for iPod videos.Now i use H264 for encoding.A bit slow
than Xvid but quality is much superior. 2-Pass H264 gives the best quality by any codec.
than Xvid but quality is much superior. 2-Pass H264 gives the best quality by any codec.
Reviewed on x264 Video Codec 665
Reply to Vboy
YO
Yoones
30 Mar 2007
5/5Excellent
Woooooooooooo The best Codec around world.
Reviewed on x264 Video Codec 635
Reply to Yoones
JA
jackie
17 Jul 2006
5/5Excellent
should be the best codec now
compressibility is almost the best with a good avs and setting
color and visual quality can be tweaked with using a CQM and suitable setting
compatibility won't be a problem because of its advantages and source opening
de-blocking filter should be turned on forever because it helps increasing the compressibility and the only thing to do is to adjust it(from -3 to 3, or from -6 to 6 with ultra-low btirate)
speed is slow without doubt, but it should and it must bt slow
this codec is for next generational encoding
its speed won't be a problem
(in fact, it isn't so slow if not encoding a 720p stuff or something similar)
compressibility is almost the best with a good avs and setting
color and visual quality can be tweaked with using a CQM and suitable setting
compatibility won't be a problem because of its advantages and source opening
de-blocking filter should be turned on forever because it helps increasing the compressibility and the only thing to do is to adjust it(from -3 to 3, or from -6 to 6 with ultra-low btirate)
speed is slow without doubt, but it should and it must bt slow
this codec is for next generational encoding
its speed won't be a problem
(in fact, it isn't so slow if not encoding a 720p stuff or something similar)
Reviewed on x264 Video Codec 536
Reply to jackie
NU
NuPogodi
15 Mar 2006
5/5Excellent
ATM, x264 does bit any other codec i've tested... Compressibility = 5, bitrate control at 2-pass encodings = 5, encoding speed = 3.
Reviewed on x264 Video Codec 468
Reply to NuPogodi
HU
hungryjoe
25 Feb 2006
5/5Excellent
better quality than any other codec i've used, however the de-blocking filter gives many features a smeared appearance and should be turned off at any bit-rate.
the codec default is to use de-blocking during encoding, the first thing you should do after installing is turn that feature off or adjust the strength and threshold to a level that doesn't make your video look like putty.
the codec default is to use de-blocking during encoding, the first thing you should do after installing is turn that feature off or adjust the strength and threshold to a level that doesn't make your video look like putty.
Reviewed on x264 Video Codec 440
Reply to hungryjoe
Share your thoughts on x264 Video Codec 0.165.3223+44
Thanks, it's in!
Your review will appear once it has been checked.