x264 Video Codec 0.165.3223+44

h264 fails for old hardware and low performance energy saving machines.

Long Live XviD.

There is a lot of positive talk about x264, and rightly so. For high-yield encodings, it does a better job than XviD, but for low bitrate encodings like 128kbps and a small screen size like 352x240, XviD still does a better job.

Minju, I am coming into terms with the Google Video Codec and it is definitely a strong contender for XviD in the field of low bitrate encodings.

I don't agree
it's a good one h.264 codec and it's free
gave me better contrast than XviD in reencoding some old videos